iResponsible


En 100 anos (y seguramente en mucho menos), cuando la tecnología haya avanzado lo suficiente, no tendremos ninguna excusa para hacer las cosas mal o sin ganas, pero tampoco ninguna responsabilidad en nada. 

Si me agarro una cirrosis por tomar demasiado, se podra trazar el camino de las culpas, hasta llegar a alguien o algo que no sea yo mismo - algo molecular, despersonalizado. 

Y condenarlo, y corregirlo. 

Bueno o malo, este futuro de (i)responsabilidad infinitamente compartida no deja de ser perturbador.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Irrecuperables wernickosos

Vos pensa: si yo te pregunto por ejemplo cual es la velocidad ideal a la cual se debe correr bajo la lluvia para mojarse menos, vas a perderte en cálculos mas o menos aproximados, y probablemente no integres toda la complejidad del problema. Incluso haciendo un montón de hipótesis simplificadoras, el problema sigue siendo una cosa que no se resuelve mentalmente (por lo menos algo que el común de los mortales no puede resolver así nomas). Y sin embargo todos opinamos en seguida sobre problemas complejisimos de la sociedad y el mundo; hay gente - escritores - que escriben como si nada mamotretos de 500 paginas sobre filosofía o política (tengo adelante mio "L'infini dans la paume de la main. Du Big Bang a l'Eveil", de Matthieu Ricard y Trinh Xuan Thuan: exactamente 471 paginas sobre temas en principio muchísimo mas complejos que el que expuse arriba). COMO PUEDE SER ESTO??? Lo único que se me ocurre, es que el mundo de las palabras esta completamente desconectado de la ...
Read more

Framerate of consciousness and motion of shades

About our "internal clock" or the "framerate" of consciousness: the characteristic speed may be the result of limitations and constraints of biochemical reactions in the brain, but it may also be the product of evolution. Take for instance the motion of the shade cast by a tree under the sun: its motion is barely noticeable, it seems to be just under the threshold of perception, but not very much lower. Why? Perhaps it is no coincidence, there may be an evolutionary reason: if we saw it moving it would interfere with our ability to detect moving creatures under the tree! So, perhaps the speed of rotation of the Earth is somehow responsible for the setting of a lower bond of our perception of flow of time (our "deltat"). Other things may also be factored to, such as the grow of plants.
Read more

Were these fishes after all?

Image
22.9.2010 Were these fishes after all? on my way to the train station, I saw a big, lively aquarium on a wall nearby. It took me a few seconds to discover that it wasn't an aquarium at all, but a big plasma screen featuring a simulation of the aquarium. The illusion of reality was all the more poignant because of the distance that did not allow for stereo disparity. These "fishes" were mere pixels on a screen. There was no fish behind the window. However, the dynamic patterns of light indicated fishes - somehow, the lights were fishes. There was something fisherly going on. One could say that "fishiness" was captured in the rules that commanded the patterns of light.  But then, in which manner this is different form real fishes in a real aquarium? If I see a real aquarium, I don't directly "connect" with the fishes (whatever this means): I only see them, I only see the way their presence modify... patterns of light that reach my e...
Read more